![audirvana plus 3 vs jriver audirvana plus 3 vs jriver](https://darko.audio/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/audirvana_version2_main.png)
- AUDIRVANA PLUS 3 VS JRIVER FOR FREE
- AUDIRVANA PLUS 3 VS JRIVER SOFTWARE
- AUDIRVANA PLUS 3 VS JRIVER FREE
It is rough around the edges but it's completely free and it sounds superb in my experience. In time I stopped looking for alternatives because I even got used to it's old-school design and listening music by albums. Not even a proper player because it lacks UI. I haven't found any except jPlay mini which is: 1. So I kept listening to it while searching for an option that can provide same sound fidelity in a more pleasant package. Foobar2000 is cleaner than jRiver in my opinion but lacks the body and palpability of Album Player.
AUDIRVANA PLUS 3 VS JRIVER SOFTWARE
but every time I switched back to jRiver I could hear loosing some fidelity in terms of less energetic leading edges and muddier sound in general. I think JRiver stated it pretty well: Jplay is a Hoax Oh, by the way, I got a lifetime ban on Computer Audiophile for pointing out that one of those (with 'inner rendering loop optimized by ear' was claiming to be open source, but refused to release the source code (that was based on another open source software player) for public scrutiny. I was hooked on immediately.Īt first I absolutely hated it's last century looks, no playlists etc. Compared to the jRiver and Foobar2000 I was using before it simply provided cleaner edges and a sense of better physical presence to every tone. For some reason 64bit version sounds quite better and cleaner on my Win 10 so that's the one I would recommend.
![audirvana plus 3 vs jriver audirvana plus 3 vs jriver](https://darko.audio/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/audirvana-sonore2.png)
AUDIRVANA PLUS 3 VS JRIVER FOR FREE
Now I couldn’t tell them apart.Last year I tried this small and fairly obscure player a friend recommended called Album Player which you can download here for free. In my case, I asked my wife to play a short fragment on one player and then the same fragment on the other player. In other words, a unsighted test so you have to assess sound quality by ear and not by sight.
![audirvana plus 3 vs jriver audirvana plus 3 vs jriver](https://roon-community-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/original/3X/f/5/f5984960f10217c47e79b4ba76c9930cf4a12cce.jpeg)
The obvious answer is a experimental design eliminating our bias. We know that our judgement (perception) is a psychological process. I checked all the settings, both WASAPI/Exclusive, no DSP, volume 100%, etc.Īlthough I heard this myself, this of course cannot be true, if both send the same file unaltered to a DAC, it must sound the same. Obvious JRiver sounds fuller/darker and Musicbee lighter and more transparent. I played a track in JRiver, then the same track in Musicbee. This reminds of the time I was comparing JRiver and Muiscbee for sound quality. Hope that this will be investigated and improved I am not so sure why this is happening since WASAPI(exclusive) is bit-perfect and no processing should be done and sent directly to the DAC.īut I guess one possibility might be due to software volume adjusting, and I find that enabling logarithmic volumes scaling seems to improve a little bit (not so much though)Īnother larger possibility might be due to the resampling method, since resampling is unavoidable for sending the sampling rate that my DAC is accepting. I really love MB's UI, and it's the only one fulfilling my requirement, so would like to ask if there will be any change in the future. One of the best audio quality I've tried is audirvana,Īnd for strawberry music player, it also provides a exceptional "clear" music but retaining a good qualityįor dopamine player, even though it is only using WASAPI in shared mode, I do think it is still quite better than MB in exclusive mode. Using the latest version, all settings that might alter sound quality such as fading/EQ/DSP are disable, and WASAPI shared/exclusive for output module. The music is clear, but that's it, feeling it too "thin", losing a lots of dynamic, details etc. However, while I found that some people claimed that Musicbee is also one of the "best sound quality" music player, I found that it is not the case when having experiences with many different players, and honestly speaking I think most of the others are doing a better job including VLC (of coz changing all setting to best audio quality). In terms of UI, Musicbee is literally the best one, and the only one showing the tags correctly, displaying large and clear album art without badly compressing it. Then I tried to find an "audiophile" alternative with good UI with great handling for displaying album art. I have been using VLC as my music player for quite a long time, but I really hate the way it handles album art (files with long album name will fail to create folder in AppData thus nothing to display)